Louisiana vs. Darwin defenders: The alligators are laughing
Floyd and Mary Beth Brown are pretty happy with the new Louisiana academic freedom bill that would permit teachers to discuss reasons why Darwin's theory of evolution might not be correct:
-----
One would think legislation which allows an environment that promotes “critical thinking” and “objective discussion” in the classroom would please everyone -- it did the bipartisan group of legislators in Louisiana -- but such is not the case. The New York Times felt threatened by the legislation, calling it “retrograde,” naming its editorial on the topic, “Louisiana’s Latest Assault on Darwin.” They were attempting to pressure Gov. Jindal to not sign the law, using a number of tactics including implicit ridicule, subtle belittling insults and untruths.
The law is straightforward and clearly restricts any intent to promote a religious doctrine. There is no mention of either intelligent design or creationism. Darwinism is not banned and teachers are required to teach students from standard textbooks. But the Times calls the legislation a “Trojan horse” because the state board of education must, upon request of local school districts, help foster an environment of “critical thinking” and “open discussion” on controversial scientific subjects. This allows teachers to use supplemental materials to analyze evolution and show views other than Darwin’s theory. It allows evolution to be criticized, and the law protects the rights of teachers and students to talk freely about a wide range of ideas without fear of reprisal.
-----
Actually, Louisiana isn't that far off the track.
Even Darwinists are now discussing how to rescue their theory without resorting to a political coup.
As evil intelligent design theorist Paul Nelson writes,
Evolutionary theory is in — and has been, for a long time — a period of great upheaval. Much of this upheaval is masked by the noise and smoke of the ID debate, and by the steady public rhetoric of major science organizations, concerned to tamp down ID-connected dissent. You know the lines: “Darwinian evolutionary theory is the foundation of biology,” et cetera.
But the upheaval is there, and increasing in amplitude and frequency. Keep moving folks, nothing to see here ...
I am antsy about the Louisiana bill. After you've tried writing curriculum for what seems like fifty different government-led revolutions in education, all you want is for the government to Just Butt Out. But, come to think of it, how would I know they were still the government if they weren't making a mess of things?
Note: Here is a picture is of a Louisiana alligator, from the Louisiana Advocate newspapers in education program. Alligators should be laughing. Do alligators bother with evolution? I can't imagine why. Once you are an alligator, where are you gonna go?
Also just up at the Post-Darwinist
Could life on Earth be much older than supposed?
Evolve already, huffingtons ... the alligators are laughing at you
What happens when we assume there is no design in nature ...
Darwin's co-discoverer thought design can be detected in nature
History moment: Quick, relabel that exhibit!
"Accepting evolution" does not make you an atheist... oh, puh-LEASE! Not this rubbish again!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison


evolutionary theory?
We still do not have an evolutionary theory. Theories are verified hypotheses. Neither Lamarckism nor Darwinism qualify as neither has received significant support. On the other hand a past evolution is undeniable and public institutions should not be encouraged to question that reality. It is only the mechanism by which evolution took place (past tense) that has ever been in question. To deny a past organic evolution is intellectually irresponsible and inexcusable.
Pierre Grasse was acutely aware of this situation. Like the real scientist that he was he presented his views in the form of questions, something the Darwinians never do. Neither do the Christian Fundamentalists. Neither camp has contributed anything of significance to the great mystery of phylogeny.
"The period of great fecundity is over; present evolution appears as a weakened process, declining or near its end. Aren't we witnessing the remains of an immense phenomenon close to extinction? Aren't the small variations which are being recorded everywhere the tail end, the last oscillations of the evolutionary movement? Aren't our plants, our animals lacking some mechanisms which were present in the early flora and fauna?
Evolution of Living Organisms, page 71.
I answer with a resounding yes to all three of Grasse's questions and further amplify them with my signature -
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
Grasse also correctly identified the perfect failure of the Darwinian fairy tale -
"Any system that purports to account for evolution must invoke a mechanism not mutational and aleatory."
Evolution of Living Organisms, page 245, the sentence in italics for emphasis.
That is exactly what my Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis presents.
I rest my case and welcome any response, supremely confident that none will appear.
john.a.davison.free.fr/