SBWillie's blog

Most scientists are starting to realize that the Victorian English doctrine of "Evolution" is well-past it's use-by date. Every day, thanks to sites like this, scientists are starting to discover that Intelligent Design is the only solution to all of the gaps in evolutionary theory. Scientists are starting to realize that the very concepts upon which the "science" of evolution is based just do not make sense:

For example, consider the phrase "Survival of the fittest". Die-hard evolutionists propose that this is the "moral force" behind the whole of evolution. But what does it actually mean? Well we all know what "survive means" - it means not becoming extinct, and having the most offspring. If you ask a Darwinist to define "fittest", you may be surprised to hear exactly the same definition: it means not becoming extinct, and having the most offspring. Could Darwinists have been so silly to have based their entire field of study on a glaringly obvious tautology?