HeLa's blog

I agree with the OE blogger Helena Blavatsky who suggested that the Darwinists' weak-spot is their addiction to scientific-naturalism, otherwise known as the “materialist assumption” - the nihilistic conjecture that the only things worth thinking about are the mundane. I concur that we have to show the flaws in materialism if we are to engage the scientific community and show the folly of evolutionary dogma, but what shall we replace it with?

If we merely knock-down the materialistic assumptions on which Darwin's theories are constructed, might something even worse rise to fill it's place? Not if we take responsibility and suggest an alternative to the flawed concepts of materialism. Fortunately such a concept exists, and it is one with an excellent philosophical pedigree. But first, let me turn my attention to the failings of materialism: